Skip to content

Category: Ethics

Pivot.

I had it all planned out. I would complete the Organon by Aristotle first, then Classical Grammar by Arnold, then Latin Grammar by Alvarez, then move into learning Spanish and Romanian, in that order. I estimated I would get to Romanian in 5-10 years, give or take.

That is no longer the plan.

It appears, for some reason, I am being heavily drawn into the following revised strategy:

  • Throttle back on Aristotle.
  • Begin attacking English Grammar with Arnold. Master it.
  • Then throw everything I can possibly muster at Romanian, and mastering it.

I understand why, but Lord have mercy this is not what I wanted to do. But I suppose it is necessary, since I am married to a Moldovan. I have in-laws, Godchildren, Godparents and friends who speak only Romanian. Concerning the souls who I am Nanu / Nașu to, I have a solemn, grave duty to help them, catechize them, and evangelize them.

I can’t do that if I only speak English. Yet, my Grammar in my language is absent, and what I’m able to accomplish now, without Grammar, is a mystery to me. I suppose the destination to the same summit no matter which direction I go. Amen.

EAR

Bellum.

There seems to be a distinction of how thoughts unground a man from reality, I am seeing 2 different kinds, again with respect to contingencies: viz. an undisciplined habit of abstraction, and a malicious assault of bait and switch.

The first seems fairly straightforward to correct. Sometimes the mind wanders, this seems to be prevalent most especially in idleness. When this happen, distractions, useless curiosities, and an unhealthy sub-culture of scrolling seem to harbor a festering pit of useless abstractions to nowhere. To what end do I scroll and poke around on the browser? As if my gandering will make a difference in some far away event that is outside of my power to change. This also doesn’t classify as true studying either, for no growth comes from this; and, thus the intellect’s capacity for good, is left unhinged to float without direction, like a leaf being tossed by the wind. Aristotle offers the answer and solution to this problem: what cannot be reached and demonstrated through reason is mere speculation. To allow our intellects to spin out of control from mindless speculation is irresponsible and a waste of potentiality.

Yet, there is a far more sinister issue we encounter with this. All of humanity is being watched by incorporeal rational entities that possess intellects far more powerful than we could possibly imagine, and wage a terrible war for our demise. These are known as demons, led by Satan, all of whom were once angels, now fallen and destined for hellfire. Their ordinary and prolific way of communicating with us is through thoughts, mental images, etc. all of which are negative in nature, termed as temptations, and designed to bring about our destruction: not because they can impose their will on us, but because they are clever enough to persuade us to sin and stray from God.

Now, knowing this is not enough to contend with them. In fact, it seems impossible to fight against a malicious assault of bait and switching from their end. You could refute their initial contingent assertions, and then suddenly find yourself considering another syllogism, and then upon refuting that, you find yourself lured into another intellectual trap abstracting when you did not intend to do so. When it becomes this bad, or rather this obvious, that it’s sole purpose being to distract you from the present task at hand, or their favorite tactic being to deprive you of sleep, the only real answer to this is prayer. Specifically the Rosary or the Liturgy of the Hours. For their reasoning, or rather their sophistry, are dashed upon the face of the rock, the corner stone who is Jesus Christ. This seems to be the only way to reassert control over the intellect, and it is by appealing to the very One who is the divine authority over all things, including demons.

So then: avoid useless abstractions, refute that which is false, but when refutation leads to an endless devious entrapment, then it’s time to pray, for no intellect, no matter how sharp, can contend with the intellect of the evil one.

EAR

Veritas.

What is truth? Or rather, what is the effect of truth? It seems be the destruction and shattering of the illusion upon which one clings to for slothful security. We all seem to have an uncanny knack of convincing ourselves, through self imposed sophistry, that a lie can be justifiable if meets the end, that end being whatever it is that suits our fancy, or shallow desire of that moment. Am I satisfied with the rhetoric that is shared with me? Do I grant every assertion made without testing them? Do I ask for evidence, proof, or demonstration of what I am regurgitating or projecting to others?

Why do I not do these things? The answer seems to be corollary to comfort. I am comfortable now. To make waves is to make things inconvenient for me later. To shatter the idol would be to initiate, and demand, a greater scrutiny of myself to determine whether or not I actually live for the truth.

The truth is exorcistic. Why wouldn’t it be? God cannot contradict himself, and our reasoning can employed to investigate this. So let us speak with precision, investigate and challenge the status quo, overtly affirm the truth, and be intolerant of lies and sophistry.

EAR